Jonathan Earl Best

(CRD #2225091, Henderson, Texas)

December 13, 2024 – Jonathan Earl Best was named a respondent in a FINRA complaint alleging that he effected trades in a senior customer’s account without first obtaining the customer’s required authorization or consent, or the authorization or consent of someone authorized to act on the customer’s behalf. The complaint alleges that the customer was the only person authorized to transact in the account, and it was non-discretionary. Further, Best’s member firm prohibited discretionary trading in retail brokerage accounts, including the customer’s account. The customer executed estate planning documents, and one of the documents provided that Best and the customer’s accountant would be granted co-power of attorney in the event that two physicians provided written statements, under oath, that they deemed the customer to be incapacitated. The firm prohibited representatives from serving as power of attorney for customers unless, in exceptional cases, approval was granted by the representative’s supervisor and the firm’s central compliance department. Best became aware that the customer was exhibiting signs of diminished capacity. Best later informed the customer’s relative, who had been appointed medical power of attorney for the customer, that he could not effect any transactions in the customer’s account due to her diminished capacity. In addition, Best requested that the relative obtain a second physician’s letter deeming the customer incapacitated in order to trigger his appointment as the customer’s co-power of attorney pursuant to the estate planning documents that she had executed. The relative did not obtain a second physician’s letter. Best subsequently submitted an OBA request to his firm for approval to serve as the customer’s future co-power of attorney and provided his supervisor with a copy of the document that the customer had executed that appointed Best as future co-power of attorney under certain conditions. Best also informed his supervisor of the customer had been diagnosed with an illness. However, Best failed to inform his supervisor that the customer was unable to care for herself, was living in a memory care facility, and was unable to discuss and understand investments. Best also never alerted his supervisor to the growing cash position in the customer’s account as a result of the customer’s inability to authorize transactions. Best’s supervisor rejected his OBA request and further instructed him to formally recuse himself from the appointment and provide documentation of the recusal. Best never provided such documentation. In addition, Best effected the purchase of laddered brokered certificates of deposit (CDs) in the customer’s account with the cash proceeds from matured and called bonds. The principal value of the unauthorized trades in the customer’s account totaled $14,199,847. Best earned $10,760.88 in compensation by placing these trades. The complaint also alleges that Best submitted two compliance attestations to his firm in which he falsely attested “no” to the firm’s question asking if he had “any senior investors or other vulnerable adults for which [he was] concerned with their capacity to make sound decisions.” Best’s attestations were false because he knew that the customer could not understand or authorize trades for her account due to her diminished capacity. (FINRA Case #2020068641501) If you have suffered losses as a result of Jonathan Earl Best's act and/or actions, we would like to hear from you. We are currently investigating claims on behalf of clients who have suffered significant losses in their portfolios that are managed by Jonathan Earl Best. The Schwartz Law Firm represents investors in claims against financial advisors and their firms. If you have questions about your potential claim or need assistance from an investment fraud lawyer, please contact us at 866-618-0545 or email Matthew Schwartz directly at mschwartz@tslfirm.com.